Is the Bible True: Evolution vs. Creation
The LORD by wisdom hath founded the earth; by understanding hath he established the heavens. By his knowledge the depths are broken up, and the clouds drop down the dew.
(Proverbs 3:19-20)
God tells us in Genesis (the creation story) and twice in Exodus (the giving of the law) that He created the universe in six days. That is six, twenty-four hour days. In Proverbs, quoted above, God tells us that He intelligently designed His creation.
Belief in creation (and a Creator) and belief in evolution (and random chance as the creating force) are both just that, a belief. Do you believe the God of the Bible, that His words are true? Or do you believe the scientists; men who claim to be open minded (to everything except a Creator)?
If you think that being a "Theistic Evolutionist" is the way to go, please reconsider. The theistic evolutionist believes that God started the evolutionary process, and perhaps may believe that God occasionally guided it. This belief does answer one of the failings of evolution; there is no "reason" the Big Bang explosion should have ignited. Still, the god proposed by the theistic evolutionist is far different than the God who breathed the Bible. The god of the theistic evolutionist is disconnected, distant, error-prone, and of limited power. In His Word, God tells us that He is ever present, lovingly concerned, all knowing, and all powerful. Let me link a site that better explains this, The Living Word.
It is impossible to prove evolution a scientific fact because, as God put the question to Job, "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell me if you have understanding." The scientific method requires as it's first step, observation.
As a theory, evolution also fails the test; there are no transistional creatures alive today, nor do any exist in the "fossil record"! For evolution to hold water as a theory, there should be observable instances of creatures evolving, there should be examples of life coming from unlife, and there should be examples of order coming from disorder. None of this exists.
So far, both under the intelligent design of scientists and natural occurrences, the closest thing to evolution that has been achieved or observed has been the altering of a species into another version of the same species! This is called "micro-evolution" and is actually part of God's design. For all the variations we have has humans, we are all still humans. All the differences between the different breeds of dogs, they are all still dogs... No mater how many weird variations of the fruit fly scientists breed, they are all still fruit flies. No transistional creatures here, everything was made after its kind. Further,
All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.as is being proven by microbiology and genetics. A better article (and discussion) on all this is linked here.
(1 Corinthians 15:39)
As for evidence of creation, look around you (Psalm 19:1-4).
2 Comments:
Regardless of whether humanity truly evolved from blobs of jelly and monkeys, as Creationists you cannot prevail in the ongoing debate about our origins. Your position is fatally flawed. You see, your position fundamentally relies upon the premise that the Judeo-Christian Bible is the Word of God. If it’s not; if the Bible is just a book, then there is no Creationist position. Recently, a lawyer embarked upon a mission to become the greatest Christian on the planet. In his quest he made a profound discovery. He discovered that the Bible is unequivocally not the Word of God. His argument is compelling. After reading his thesis, I am both shocked and embarrassed that I spent my whole life as a Christian and a Creationist. And while his thesis does not invalidate the so-called theory of “Intelligent Design,” it absolutely dismantles the theory of Biblical Creationism. I read the book two days ago and I'm still rather high on it...so, forgive me for promoting it. I'm trying to get some feedback from people who think about this type of thing more than I do. You can read his Thesis at www.indefenseofgod.com.
It's interesting, the atheist who earnestly sets out to find the truth ultimately becomes a believer in God. Check out any of Lee Strobel's books for example.
www.caseforacreator.com
Lee Strobel was (is?) an investigative journalist (and also an avowed atheist, originally) who went out to find the real story for himself.
I do agree that creationism and Christianity are hinged upon the Bible. However I disagree that this is a fatal flaw.
I was just looking at the website, and you have mis-characterized it somewhat. The man you are choosing to follow (if you are not simply the author himself, as it appears you are) was a devout Catholic, not a Christian. In his quest to become the perfect Catholic, he became disillusioned. (Perfectly understandable, Catholicism and the Bible parted ways hundreds and hundreds of years ago.) He claims boldly that he wrote his book "in defense of God", but from the preview, on the website, it is obvious that he wrote the book "in defense of his own god" not the God of the Bible.
Instead of reading the Bible in order to meet, or to find the God that is described in it; this man read the Bible seeking to make the God described in it to fit into his own conception of god. Of course he failed miserably.
As far as I know, "Anonymous" is the actual author of the website, looking to drum up some business by spamming Biblical and Anti-Biblical sites. The site's blog has only been on line since January 30th. (Actually, reading some of the comments proves that to be the case.)
If God gives me the time, perhaps I write a counter to it. (Though from reading the preview, the man's "arguments" are self-refuting.)
Post a Comment
<< Home